To build on conceptual learning, students must fully understand those concepts. To do that, you need to return to that knowledge repeatedly

7 simple rules for science teaching

Every Wednesday from now until September, we’ll publish a new article and resource supporting the evidence-based principles in the EEF Improving secondary science guidance. 

If you hold a pen in your hand, suspended in the air, and let go of it, where will it go? Up or down?

If you’re standing on Earth, the pen will probably drop down to the floor, and this is unlikely to take you by surprise, because you understand how gravity acts on objects. Gravity is a transformative concept that acts as a ‘portal’ to deeper understanding, and we are unlikely to ‘forget’ it, because it’s continually reinforced by occurrences in the world around us.

An image showing a teacher paying close attention to a female student who is reading from a book; a classmate is also present, and the two pupils are sitting on chairs made out of books

Source: © Claudia Flandoli

When we teach science, we constantly introduce our students to new concepts, some of which are fairly straightforward to understand or quite specific. But some are more complex, and underpin a range of ideas. Particle theory, for example, is at the heart of a range of topics in chemistry. Melting points, bonding, electrical conductivity and solubility are just a few of the ideas that require an appreciation of how particles behave.

7 simple rules to boost science teaching

Click to expand and explore the rules

Build on the ideas that pupils bring to lessons

  1. Understand the preconceptions that pupils bring to science lessons
  2. Develop pupils’ thinking through cognitive conflict and discussion
  3. Allow enough time to challenge misconceptions and change thinking

Help pupils direct their own learning

  1. Explicitly teach pupils how to plan, monitor, and evaluate their learning
  2. Model your own thinking to help pupils develop their metacognitive and cognitive knowledge
  3. Promote metacognitive talk and dialogue in the classroom

Use models to support understanding

  1. Use models to help pupils develop a deeper understanding of scientific concepts
  2. Select the models you use with care
  3. Explicitly teach pupils about models and encourage pupils to critique them

Use practical work purposefully and as part of a learning sequence

  1. Know the purpose of each practical activity
  2. Sequence practical activities with other learning
  3. Use practical work to develop scientific reasoning
  4. Use a variety of approaches to practical science

Use structured feedback to move on pupils’ thinking

  1. Find out what your pupils understand
  2. Think about what you’re providing feedback on
  3. Provide feedback as comments rather than marks
  4. Make sure pupils can respond to your feedback

Do you ever explicitly review basic particle theory with 11–14 and 14–16 students, and point out how it relates to the ideas you introduce to them? When I first taught students about fractional distillation, I was explaining why larger molecules have higher boiling points. But I hadn’t first explained to them that each of the molecules I was talking about was represented by a circle in the particle diagrams they used in year 7. Without this, many were floundering, and couldn’t connect the two ideas.

If I’d pointed out the parallels between my newly introduced idea and the well-understood, fundamental concept from the start, they would have appreciated more readily why intermolecular forces affect boiling point. But even after this link was made, students would still need to understand more generally why some liquids have higher boiling points than others. This, of course, also links back to particle theory.

So particle theory, like gravity, really is a transformative concept, upon which many later ideas are built. Such integrative ideas can be described as threshold concepts, because they pave the way to deeper understanding. Such concepts are often tricky to master, but they allow students to make all sorts of conceptual connections that were previously out of reach.

Wouldn’t it be great if our students could remember these concepts indefinitely, and apply them unaided to a range of contexts? In my experience, students often appear to ‘unlearn’ the concepts we’ve taught them, and struggle to relate them to novel situations. How many times have you felt exasperated as you explain, yet again, that it’s not electrons that move and carry charge in molten sodium chloride, it’s ions? Learning is a liminal process, with students often taking steps backwards as well as forwards, before they achieve conceptual mastery. So we need to revisit and review these ideas with our students in a range of contexts, to ensure they’ve fully (and securely) understood them.

Revisiting concepts with students might be wise for other reasons, too. How often have you started to teach a tricky idea, before deciding to stop and return to it another day? Sometimes, you can see students becoming visibly overloaded, and unable to take any more on board. You know from experience that, following a little time and space to forget and reflect, students are much more likely to understand these new ideas.

In your class

Download a tracker and diagnostic question examples to help you monitor students’ progression as MS Word or pdf.

But how do you identify the concepts in a particular topic that students will find tricky? A good starting point is misconceptions literature and resources, which are freely available on Learn Chemistry. You can use these to identify common stumbling blocks, and make sure you review them explicitly, using resources like this one on ionic bonding.

As teachers, we shouldn’t take conceptual understanding for granted, and we can’t guarantee that it will be immediately transformative. But if we identify the key underlying concepts in each topic we teach, and revisit them a number of times, in different contexts, our students are much more likely to integrate them and remember them long-term.

This article is part of the series 7 simple rules for science teaching, developed in response to the EEF’s Improving secondary science guidance. It supports rule 1c, Allow enough time to challenge misconceptions and change thinking.